Contact: 
Mike Westling, 414-507-7700
mike@brinkcomm.com

In 2016, Fair Shot coalition will push elected officials to stop wage theft, raise the wage, and end profiling

Portland, Ore. – In anticipation of the upcoming legislative session, the Fair Shot for All coalition launched their 2016 Legislative Agenda on Thursday. The agenda includes stopping wage theft, ending profiling, and raising the wage. 

“While we’ve made significant progress, the reality is that many Oregonians continue to struggle in the face of long-standing inequities and we still face a growing gap between the wealthy and working families,” said Andrea Miller, executive director of Causa. “By coming together, we can stand up to discrimination, honor the value of hard work and build stronger communities.” 

In addition to continuing work to raise Oregon’s minimum wage and end profiling, the coalition is taking on wage theft, a series of illegal employment practices that deny workers the wages they’ve earned. 

Examples of wage theft include:

  • Employers paying less than the minimum wage
  • Refusing to pay overtime
  • Forcing employees to work “off the clock” or “under the table”
  • Issuing paychecks that bounce
  • Stealing tips
  • Denying legally-required breaks, and
  • Flat out not paying workers at all. 

In 2016, Fair Shot for All will be urging state legislators to:

  • Give workers the tools to expose employer wrongdoing;
  • Reduce the barriers that prevent workers from getting help; and recovering the wages they are owed; and
  • Put an end to workplace abuses that leave workers and their families shortchanged.

“The reality is, that even when working Oregonians put in an honest day’s work, they don’t always receive an honest day’s pay,” said Tom Chamberlain, president of Oregon AFL-CIO. “Oregon law doesn’t always protect workers who experience wage theft, who are often immigrants, women, people of color and low-wage workers. While most employers in our communities do right by their workers, there are too many that don’t.”

Read more here. 

###

Fair Shot for All is a broad coalition of community, healthcare service, and labor groups that collectively stand for the dreams, beliefs, and needs of hundreds of thousands of Oregonians. The coalition members have joined together to push for real policy solutions that address economic inequality and create a better future for all Oregonians.

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

Contact:
Michelle Glass, 541-292-8201
michelle@oregonaction.org

Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum will hear input from Southern Oregon community members about the effects of police profiling and public suggestions for addressing the issue

What:            

Police profiling continues to be a serious problem that affects Oregonians in communities across the state. Incidents of profiling can result in negative emotional, psychological, physical and financial trauma that disrupts lives and creates ripple effects for families.

On Thursday, members of the community will share their personal experiences with profiling with Oregon’s Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum. During the listening session, Attorney General Rosenblum will also share a summary of the Oregon Task Force on Law Enforcement Profiling’s work to date and community leaders will offer guidance for an effective process to investigate incidents of profiling and end the practice among law enforcement in Oregon.

When/Where:

Thursday, November 5, at 6:00 p.m.
 Rogue Community College / Southern Oregon University Higher Education Center
101 S. Bartlett
Room 129B
Medford, OR 97501
 
Who:             

Oregon Action Board Member Ricardo Lujan and other members of the community will statements of personal experiences with police profiling.

To speak with Ricardo Lujan about his story, you can contact him at 760.810.2121 or ricardolujan@cnpls.net. To connect with other community members who will be testifying on Thursday evening or to receive more information about the statewide effort to end profiling, please contact Michelle Glass at 541.292.8201 or michelle@oregonaction.org.

Why: 

Currently in Oregon, each law enforcement agency is left to decide their own definition and process on profiling. Profiling occurs in every part of the state and impacts many different communities, and until the Oregon Legislature passed House Bill 2002 in July 2015, there had been no coordinated state policy to address it.

House Bill 2002 banned the practice of profiling as a law enforcement tactic. It also created the Law Enforcement Profiling Work Group—a governor-appointed committee that includes the Attorney General, law enforcement, community groups and members of the public—tasked with following up on transparency and accountability. The next step is for that workgroup to propose a process to identify patterns or practices of profiling, identify methods to address and correct these practices and biased policies, and prepare a report identifying any additional statutory changes that are needed to achieve these goals.

People in low-income neighborhoods and communities of color are targeted the most, leading to higher arrest and conviction rates among people of color generally—and African-Americans specifically. Many are already struggling to make ends meet and risk harsher penalties and extra fees when they can’t afford to pay the fines that often result from unfair profiling—putting their jobs on the line and their families at risk.
 
While the Oregon legislature passed legislation to ban police profiling in 2015, there is still no structure in place to effectively identify, record, and correct any profiling practices by Oregon law enforcement agencies.

By ending profiling, Oregon will start to change the culture of policing, making neighborhoods safer and communities stronger.

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

Contact:
Mike Westling, 414-507-7700
mike@brinkcomm.com

Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum will hear input from Portland community members about the effects of police profiling and public suggestions for addressing the issue

What:            

Police profiling continues to be a serious problem that affects Oregonians in communities across the state. Incidents of profiling can result in negative emotional, psychological, physical and financial trauma that disrupts lives and creates ripple effects for families.

On Tuesday, members of the community will share their personal experiences with profiling with Oregon’s Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum. During the listening session, Attorney General Rosenblum will also share a summary of the Oregon Task Force on Law Enforcement Profiling’s work to date and community leaders will offer guidance for an effective process to investigate incidents of profiling and end the practice among law enforcement in Oregon.

When/Where: 

Tuesday, October 27, at 6:00 p.m.
Portland Building
1120 SW 5th Avenue
Room C
Portland, OR 97204
 
Who:             
 

Community members sharing statements include:

Eduardo Corona, the small business development program director of Adelante Mujeres in Forest Grove

Quinton Blandon, a pre-med college student

Blandon will share a personal story of being chased at gunpoint by Newberg police as he was walking home. Blandon’s written account of his experience is included below.

If you’d like to connect with Corona or Blandon about their experiences with police profiling, please contact Mike Westling at 414.507.7700 or mike@brinkcomm.com

Why: 

Currently in Oregon, each law enforcement agency is left to decide their own definition and process on profiling. Profiling occurs in every part of the state and impacts many different communities, and until the Oregon Legislature passed House Bill 2002 in July 2015, there had been no coordinated state policy to address it.

House Bill 2002 banned the practice of profiling as a law enforcement tactic. It also created the Law Enforcement Profiling Work Group—a governor-appointed committee that includes the Attorney General, law enforcement, community groups and members of the public—tasked with following up on transparency and accountability. The next step is for that workgroup to propose a process to identify patterns or practices of profiling, identify methods to address and correct these practices and biased policies, and prepare a report identifying any additional statutory changes that are needed to achieve these goals.

People in low-income neighborhoods and communities of color are targeted the most, leading to higher arrest and conviction rates among people of color generally—and African-Americans specifically. Many are already struggling to make ends meet and risk harsher penalties and extra fees when they can’t afford to pay the fines that often result from unfair profiling—putting their jobs on the line and their families at risk.
 
While the Oregon legislature passed legislation to ban police profiling in 2015, there is still no structure in place to effectively identify, record, and correct any profiling practices by Oregon law enforcement agencies.
By ending profiling, Oregon will start to change the culture of policing, making neighborhoods safer and communities stronger.

###

Quinton Blandon’s Story

For the past three years, I have been attending college at George Fox University in Newberg, Oregon. While the campus certainly has not been a safe haven from bigotry, it is the Newberg police department that has provided me with my most racist experiences to date. One evening, while I was walking home from the gym, a squad car with two officers drove up on the side of me. The driving officer then slowed the car to the pace I was walking, both officers were looking at me like they wanted to get out the car and kill me.  I was horrified but stood my ground and stared back. After about twenty seconds of eye contact between the officers and I, the driving officer began to speed up and slow down in short spurts. After thoroughly intimidating me for about one minute, the two officers finally sped off at about 60 miles per hour with their blue and red lights on.  I was so scared after they left, I ran the remaining 60 yards home breathing heavily, feeling unsafe, and shaking. At that particular moment I knew the police in Newberg could not be trusted and that I was a target for their harassment, misconduct, and profiling. As awful as this incident may sound, this was not the last time I would be left feeling violated by the Newberg police.
On the night of November 24, 2012, I was walking home from a friend’s house. When I got one house down from where I lived, a police car turned the corner and drove past me head on, after the officers drove fifty yards past me, they turned off their headlights, turned on their red and blue lights, and began speeding towards me at more than 70 miles per hour.  The driving officer jumped out of his vehicle with his hands on his utility belt.  I asked, “what’s the problem officer?” to which he responded, “you were walking in the middle of the street.”  I replied, “no I wasn’t sir.”  That’s when the officer drew his gun, pointed it at me, and began walking towards me. I was so scared I tried running home. Unfortunately, I only got as far as my neighbors yard. While frantically yelling for help, an officer approached me with his flashlight in my face, threw me to the ground, and twisted my hands behind my back so hard, I felt my left shoulder pop out of socket. I immediately told the officers about the pain I was in but I didn’t get offered any medical attention. I was stood up and escorted by an officer to the street with about ten or more other officers surrounding me. After asking why I was stopped, an officer responded, you were in the street, which I am certain I was not. I then said,” this is so unfair” An officer then blurted out, “ Geez! You guys need to stop blaming everyone else for what happens to you and take responsibility for you guys’ action, you all would be a lot better off if you did.” One officer reinforced this statement under his breath by stating, “that’s right N-word.”  An officer then searched me without my consent, and when I asked for badge cards, all the arresting officers’ refused to provide me with theirs.
It is needless to say this experience was life changing for me. The encounters I’ve had with the Newberg police particularly the latter have severely traumatized me.  Whenever I see a police car, my heart begins to race, I sweat beads, and I become bogged down by anxiety.  As a result of consistently being terrorized by the Newberg police, I am not only fearful of the police but I do not want to support or assist them in any way. Of course not all cops are bad and I have had some positive encounters with the police, but the bad experiences outweigh the good by far, therefore, it has become apparent to me I’m a citizen who is protected and served but I am also extremely vulnerable to police brutality because I am a black male. 
Also, in both encounters, I was charged with a host of misdemeanors that I did not earn and my life went into a tailspin. After that night, I was suspended from my second semester of college, I had to quit my job, and also, I’m finding it a lot harder to find a job and housing.
Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

In 2014, over twenty Oregon labor unions, community groups and racial justice organizations came together to form Fair Shot For All. We launched our powerful and unique coalition with one objective: to give a voice to those who are often left behind in the political process, to turn the discussion of racial and economic inequality into action—and to win.
 
The Register Guard editorial board highlighted our “potent political agenda” earlier this month. Read what they had to say about Fair Shot For All here.
 
As a coalition, we worked in lockstep in support of five policy solutions that address longstanding economic inequities and fix the outdated, broken rules that shape our work, wages and planning for the future. And today, four of these key policies are now the law of the land in Oregon.
 
I’m pleased to provide you an overview of these policy wins and share what’s next for our coalition.  

Working families are the big winners of the Oregon 2015 Legislative Session

Oregon’s 2015 legislative session brought big gains working families. With the support of Fair Shot For All, Oregon lawmakers passed the following four policies aimed at making a difference in the lives of Oregonians.

Expanding Access to Sick Time. Just under half a million working Oregonians will earn sick time that can be used for the diagnosis, care or treatment of the worker or a member of their family or in instances of domestic violence.

Banning the Box. Removing the box about criminal history on job applications will give people with prior convictions and arrests a better chance at getting back to work and rebuilding their lives.

Making Saving For Retirement Easier. Every working Oregonian will have access to an easy, effective way to plan for the future and build a retirement savings.

Ending Profiling. Banning the practice of profiling as a law enforcement tactic will shift Oregon to community policing, a more effective public safety strategy that make neighborhoods safer by fostering trust between law enforcement officers and communities.

Read more about each of these bills here.

Governor Brown and Fair Shot For All Hold Bill Signing Ceremony

On July 13th, Governor Kate Brown and Fair Shot For All held a ceremonial bill signing for the Fair Shot package of bills that create economic opportunity for Oregon’s working families.
 
More than 150 of our supporters—including workers, business owners, and community and labor leaders—joined together to celebrate these four major victories. Check out photos from the Fair Shot bill signing here.
 
We thank Governor Brown, the leadership of Oregon’s House of Representatives and Senate, all those who made us a priority and supported these important bills. Hear what Governor Brown had to say about giving Oregonians a fair shot here.
 
We also thank our supporters who showed up at hearings, met with legislators, made phone calls, wrote letters, and rallied in cities across the state. They shared their stories and made the case for change. And Oregon’s elected leaders heard their call.

Our work isn’t done

Oregon is not alone – we are part of a wave that is happening across the country. Working families, small business owners, and community leaders from every corner of the United States continue calling for real solutions that will give every one of us an opportunity to succeed.
 
We achieved significant progress for working families this session, but our work is far from over.
 
Raise the wage

Today in Oregon, a full-time worker with a minimum wage job is paid less than $20,000 per year, leaving thousands of Oregonians working hard but still unable to make ends meet. Raising the minimum wage will give more Oregonians a chance to be self-sufficient and to better provide for themselves and their children.
 
Fair Shot For All will continue our fight to give hardworking Oregonians a raise in 2016 and give back local control to communities to raise the wage to $15 and beyond.
 
New solutions for working families

We will also take action on new issues in the 2016 legislative session, policies that address what’s preventing Oregonians from getting ahead. Over the coming months, we will engage communities around the state to zero in on what’s important to working families and roll out a new agenda with real solutions that will make a difference in the lives of Oregonians.
 
Fair Shot For All remains focused on building an economy that generates rising incomes and opportunity for everyone who’s willing to put in the effort.
 
Here’s the bottom line: We refuse to accept an economy where only a few of us do well.
 
I urge you to visit the Fair Shot For All website and follow Fair Shot for All on Facebook for the latest updates on our fight forward. 
 
Onward!
 
- Heather

Heather Stuart
Fair Shot for All Campaign Director

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

Contact: Dahlia Grossman-Heinze, dahlia@brinkcomm.com562-212-2999

Oregon leads the country with a slate of legislation that includes paid sick days, retirement security, ‘banning the box’, and ending profiling

Photos updating at: https://www.flickr.com/photos/oregongovbrown/albums

(Salem, Ore.)—Governor Kate Brown today signed into law four polices that will create economic opportunity for Oregon’s working families: expanding access to paid sick days, making saving for retirement easier, “banning the box” to create job opportunities for people with prior convictions and arrests, and ending profiling based on race, gender and sexual orientation.

“I was thrilled to sign these four pieces of legislation that will strengthen the economic security of working families in our state,” said Governor Brown. “I want to thank the Legislature and the advocates for their tireless work to get these bills to my desk. Yet, our work is not done. There are still people with full time jobs who are unable to make ends meet. We must carry on the fight to ensure all Oregonians have the opportunity to earn a living wage.”

The four bills are part of the Fair Shot For All legislative agenda announced by the coalition in January, just before the start of the Oregon 2015 Legislative Session. Over twenty Oregon labor unions, community groups and racial justice organizations came together to form Fair Shot For All. The coalition focuses on addressing longstanding economic inequality, fixing our broken economy and giving all Oregonians a fair shot at success.

“Fair Shot For All set out this session to win real improvements in the lives of Oregonians, and working families, small business owners, and community leaders from all over the state were behind us every step of the way,” said Andrea Paluso, Fair Shot For All Co-Chair and Family Forward Oregon Executive Director. “Today, we’re pleased to stand with Governor Brown and celebrate four major victories that help mark this legislative session as one of the most significant in recent history for Oregon’s working families. ”

The remaining bill in the Fair Shot For All agenda, raising the minimum wage, will be considered when the legislature reconvenes in January 2016. Below is a listing of the four bills signed into law:

Expanding Access to Sick Time

Senate Bill 454, the paid sick time bill, creates a statewide standard so workers in businesses with 10 or more employees can earn one hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours worked, up to 40 hours (about five days) in a year. Workers in smaller businesses with less than 10 employees will receive job protection for up to 40 hours of unpaid sick time a year.

Just under half a million working Oregonians will soon earn sick time that can be used for the diagnosis, care or treatment of the worker or a member of their family or in instances of domestic violence. The bill also protects employees from retaliation or discrimination for the use of sick time.

Banning the Box

House Bill 3025 prohibits employers from including questions about applicants’ criminal history on job applications.

Successful employment is one of the most important factors for decreasing recidivism. A steady job provides not just financial resources, but also connections to a new community that can help reduce the risk of another offense.

In Oregon, nearly 5,000 people are released from prison every year. By removing the box, people will have a better chance at getting back to work and rebuilding their lives, becoming productive members of society who pay taxes and support other local businesses.

Making Saving For Retirement Easier 

House Bill 2960 provides every Oregonian with a safe, easy and effective way to save for retirement.  A state-sponsored plan will make it incredibly easy for small business owners to offer retirement plans– they will only need to add a line item to the monthly pay stub.

Currently, nearly half of all Oregonians do not have a retirement plan at work. As a result, many are at risk of living in poverty when they retire – unable to cover basic living and medical expenses. Oregon’s senior population is projected to increase from 502,000 to 950,000 by 2030. By taking action, Oregon has helped avoid a social and state budgetary crisis for the state.

Ending Profiling

House Bill 2002 bans the practice of profiling as a law enforcement tactic. Oregon will soon shift to community policing, a more effective public safety strategy that fosters trust between law enforcement officers and communities.

People in low-income neighborhoods and communities of color are targeted the most, leading to higher arrest and conviction rates among people of color generally—and African-Americans specifically. Many are already struggling to make ends meet and risk harsher penalties and extra fees when they can’t afford to pay the fines that often result from unfair profiling—putting their jobs on the line and their families at risk.

By ending profiling, Oregon will start to change the culture of policing, making neighborhoods safer and communities stronger.

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

Contact:
Mike Westling
(503) 498-8161
mike@brinkcomm.com

Raising the wage remains as unfinished business of the 2015 legislative session

Salem, Ore. – With Sine Die expected in the next several days, the Fair Shot for All coalition today called the 2015 legislative session “one of the most significant sessions in recent history for Oregon’s working families,” with four major policy solutions enacted into law.

In 2014, more than 20 community and labor groups formed a coalition with the goal of passing real policy solutions aimed at fixing our broken economy and giving all Oregonians a fair shot at success.  Together, Fair Shot for All identified five key policy priorities for the 2015 legislative session:

  • Expand access to paid sick days
  • Establish a secure way to save for the future
  • “Ban the box“ to create job opportunities for people with prior convictions and arrests
  • End police profiling based on race, gender and sexual orientation
  • Raise the minimum wage

As the 2015 session comes to a close, the Oregon Legislature has approved four of these five policies, marking significant progress toward economic security for working families. The sole priority still outstanding is raising Oregon’s minimum wage.

“The power of Fair Shot for All comes from its members: working families, small business owners, and community leaders from all over the state who have been calling for real solutions that will give every Oregonian an opportunity to succeed,”said Andrea Miller, executive director of Causa. “Throughout the 2015 legislative session, they showed up at hearings, met with legislators, made phone calls, wrote letters, and rallied in cities across the state. They shared their stories and made the case for change. They made their voices heard in Salem and elected officials responded.”

 Despite several legislative successes for working Oregonians, the state’s elected leaders have failed to take action to raise the wage as the 2015 session comes to a close.  Today in Oregon, a full-time worker with a minimum wage job is paid less than $20,000 per year, leaving thousands of Oregonians working hard but still unable to make ends meet.

“We achieved significant progress for working families this session, but our work is far from over,” said Andrea Paluso, executive director of Family Forward Oregon. "While the legislature’s failure to act to raise the wage is disappointing, we will continue pushing our elected officials to take actions that create an economy that works for all of us. Raising the minimum wage will give more Oregonians a chance to be self-sufficient and to better provide for themselves and their children. These families simply can't afford to wait much longer."

Contrary to popular belief, the typical minimum wage worker in Oregon isn’t a teenager living with their parents. A 2015 study from the Labor Education and Research Center at the University of Oregon reported that the average age of minimum wage workers is 35. The study also reported that nearly two-thirds of minimum wage workers are women and many of them are supporting families.

 

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

Contact:
Mike Westling
(503) 498-8161
mike@brinkcomm.com

HB 2002 brings together law enforcement and communities around data collection, improved reporting, increased accountability

 Salem, Ore. – The Oregon Senate approved legislation Wednesday to ban the practice of profiling as a law enforcement tactic with a vote of 28 to 1. HB 2002 will now head to Governor Kate Brown’s desk for her signature.

HB 2002 has received bipartisan support in both chambers of the Oregon legislature and has the backing of the Center for Intercultural Organizing, the NAACP, Basic Rights Oregon, Oregon Association Chiefs of Police, and the Oregon Sheriff’s Association.

“Profiling corrodes the relationship between law enforcement and the communities they serve,” said House Speaker Tina Kotek. “To eliminate profiling, we need to face it head on, recognize it and provide the means to report and address the problem when it occurs.”

 “We need this law to protect the credibility of the policing function, because it is vital to our functioning civic life,” according to Chief Sponsor Representative Lew Frederick. “When people avoid calling the police because they fear them, the breakdown of civic order is almost as scary as the gun I faced during a nonsensical traffic stop. Imagine your reaction if you were pulled over in your car, or stopped while walking, for no discernible reason. Then imagine that it happens again and again. If you can imagine that, you’ve imagined a piece of our world. Profiling degrades the quality of our everyday lives. It needs to be illegal. It needs to stop.”

Currently in Oregon, each law enforcement agency is left to decide their own definition and process on profiling. Profiling occurs in every part of the state and impacts many different communities, and until now there has been no coordinated state policy to address it.

“The bottom line: profiling doesn’t make our communities safer,” said Senator Alan Bates. “By defining, tracking, and addressing profiling when it occurs, we can protect the freedoms of Oregonians while supporting our law enforcement community.”

HB 2002 defines profiling and clearly bans law enforcement from using profiling as a tactic in Oregon. The bill also requires law enforcement agencies to collect complaint data about profiling and establishes a process for accepting and addressing profiling complaints.

“Profiling occurs daily in many forms across Oregon, making those who are targeted by police often feel like prisoners in their own communities,” said Kayse Jama, Executive Director of the Center for Intercultural Organizing. “By defining profiling and establishing a consistent process for recording complaints, we can help build trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve. This legislation is an important step toward ending a systemic problem, but it does not mean our work is done. Actual change has to be felt on the ground."

"To believe that there is no profiling within our state is to ignore the daily struggles that our minority communities go through because of profiling,” said Ricardo Lujan, Board Member for Oregon Action. “I encourage everyone to challenge themselves and become more aware of this issue and how it affects our neighbors. It is important for Oregon to make a change so that our neighbors, friends and families can feel safer."

In addition, the bill would also create the Law Enforcement Profiling Work Group, a new entity tasked with proposing a process to identify patterns or practices of profiling, identifying methods to address and correct these practices and biased policies, and preparing a report identifying any additional statutory changes that are needed to achieve these goals.

“Profiling has no place in professional policing – it is discriminatory and ineffective,” said Kevin Campbell, Executive Director of the Oregon Association Chiefs of Police. “Law enforcement leaders here in Oregon continue to work to ensure that we have the most professional and just policing culture in the nation, to take reports of profiling seriously and to take action to make our communities safer. We’re supporting HB 2002 because we recognize that strong partnerships, better data, and additional options for citizens to file concerns and complaints all help law enforcement officers do their jobs.”

If you would like to interview Kayse Jama, Ricardo Lujan, or Kevin Campbell, please contact Mike Westling at mike@brinkcomm.com or (503) 498-8161 to coordinate.

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

Contact:
Mike Westling
(503) 498-8161
mike@brinkcomm.com

Fair Shot For All Coalition and the Western Region Summer Institute for Union Women Gather to Hear Speakers Call for Raising the Wage

Portland, Ore. – Members of the Fair Shot Coalition and the Western Region Summer Institute for Union Women will gather in Portland to hold a minimum wage rally Friday at 3:00pm in solidarity with workers who are fighting for a fair shot.

Thousands of hardworking Oregonians making minimum wage – women, people of color,immigrants and families – simply don’t earn enough to make ends meet. When people can’t afford to buy food, go to the doctor or make basic repairs, it drags our economy down.

Currently, one in four Oregon workers brings home less than $25,000 each year. Women and people of color make up the largest percentage of our low-wage workforce. In Oregon, women represent more than half of minimum wage workers while people of color make up about 36 percent.

WHAT:               

The Fair Shot For All coalition and the Western Region Summer Institute for Union Women will hold a rally in solidarity with workers who are fighting for a fair shot.

WHEN:

Friday, June 26

3 p.m.

WHERE:                 

Reed College Great Lawn

3203 SE Woodstock Blvd.

Portland, OR 97202

WHO:

Speaking in support of raising the minimum wage include: 

·  Barbara Byrd, Secretary-Treasurer, AFL-CIO

·  Ed Hall, Labor Liaison, Office of Jeff Merkley

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

Contact:
Mike Westling
(503) 498-8161
mike@brinkcomm.com

HB 2002 receives bipartisan support from Joint Ways and Means Committee

Salem, Ore. – Legislation to ban the practice of profiling as a law enforcement tactic received bipartisan approval Tuesday from the Oregon Legislature’s Joint Ways and Means Committee. HB 2002 also requires law enforcement agencies to collect complaint data about profiling and establishes a process for accepting and addressing profiling complaints. The legislation will next move to the Oregon House and the Oregon Senate for passage before heading to the desk of Governor Kate Brown for her signature.

“Profiling doesn’t come from a training manual – it’s a cultural problem,” said Senator Chris Edwards. “By collecting data and establishing the authority to track and investigate complaints, HB 2002 will help eliminate this tactic from our communities.”

HB 2002 will also create the Law Enforcement Profiling Work Group, a new entity tasked with proposing a process to identify patterns or practices of profiling, identifying methods to address and correct these practices and biased policies, and preparing a report identifying any additional statutory changes that are needed to achieve these goals.

“Profiling in policing isn’t just an inconvenience – it’s a practice that actively weakens public safety efforts and has real, damaging effects on our communities,”said Rep. Brad Witt. “Law enforcement, community groups, and folks from across the state are supporting this bill because it provides tangible ways that we address this challenge together. “

"The issue is complex but this bill is need to help move things forward in the right direction,” said Senator Chuck Thomsen.

To be effective, law enforcement officials must have the full confidence of the communities they serve. The Oregon Association Chiefs of Police and the Oregon Sheriffs Association have been actively engaged in the creation of policy to end profiling in policing. Both organizations were at the table helping to craft the final proposal and have endorsed HB 2002.

“The problem of profiling isn’t limited to places like Portland,” said Jeana Frazzini, Executive Director of Basic Rights Oregon. Around the state, members of the LGBTQ community, especially people of color and transgender individuals, are targeted by law enforcement because of who they are. This legislation will help make Oregon a safer and more just place to live by establishing procedures for accepting complaints and holding law enforcement accountable.”

HB 2002 will help Oregon shift away from profiling-based policing tactics to community policing, a more effective public safety strategy that fosters trust between law enforcement officers and communities by building partnerships and addressing the conditions that generate public safety issues.

“This effort is an opportunity to build trust and create partnerships between law enforcement and members of the community,” said Lane County NAACP President Eric Richardson. “By working together to change the culture of policing in Oregon, we can make our neighborhoods safer and strengthen our communities.”

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

Contact:
Mike Westling
(503) 498-8161
mike@brinkcomm.com

Oregonians delivered over 3,800 postcards to legislators, urging immediate action to raise the minimum wage

Salem, Ore. – A group of over 50 workers, small business owners, and advocates from across the state assembled in Salem today to push elected officials to take action and raise the wage in Oregon.

The group gathered outside the capitol and held one-on-one meetings with their legislators, calling for action to raise the minimum wage and restore local control to allow communities to set wages above and beyond the statewide floor.

During the legislative meetings, the group delivered over 3,800 postcards from Oregonians who support raising the state’s minimum wage and asked their elected leaders to take action before the current session comes to an end.

Photos from the minimum wage lobby day are available online: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sa041qp8iejwdvu/AADtobvThOHysSnVbQKc8nEKa?dl=0

Earlier in the day, the House Committee on Business and Labor and the Senate Committee on Workforce held a joint informational meeting to consider policy strategies to address poverty in Oregon. During the hearing, SEIU Local 503 Executive Director Heather Conroy and Causa Executive Director Andrea Miller testified in support of one of the most effective means of addressing poverty: raising the minimum wage.

“Raising the minimum wage will bring back an honest day’s pay for an honest day’s work, giving Oregonians a chance to be self-sufficient and provide a future for themselves and their children,” said Causa Executive Director Andrea Miller. Hardworking Oregonians can’t wait any longer – it’s time for legislative leaders to raise the wage so families can thrive and our economy can work for all of us.”

While the legislature has failed to take action to raise the state’s minimum wage during the 2015 session, House Speaker Tina Kotek revived the conversation on Monday when she announced a proposal to raise Oregon’s minimum wage to $13.00 by 2018 and restore the ability of cities and towns to set a local minimum wage that is higher than the statewide floor.

 

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

 

For more information, contact:

Mike Westling | Save Today, Secure Tomorrow

(503) 498-8161 |

Oregon Legislature approves blueprint to create a retirement savings plan and make it available to working Oregonians 2017

Salem, Ore. – The Oregon Senate passed legislation Tuesday that will ensure everyOregonian has access to a safe, easy and effective way to save for retirement. The bill cleared the Oregon House last week and will next go to the desk of Governor Kate Brown for her signature.

"The facts are clear: too many of Oregon's seniors are retiring into poverty, and we know that giving people access to a retirement savings plan works," said Representative Tobias Read. "House Bill 2960 gives Oregonians the opportunity to take control of their own retirement now and in the future."

HB 2960 creates the Oregon Retirement Savings Fund Board and directs the board to create a retirement savings plan accessible to all Oregonians.  The board will be chaired by the State Treasurer and will include representation from legislators, investors, employers, workers and retirees.

“Currently, nearly half of all Oregonians do not have a retirement plan at work,” said Senator Lee Beyer. “As a result, many are at risk of living in poverty when they retire – unable to cover basic living and medical expenses. House Bill 2960 provides a blueprint for creating a retirement savings plan that will help Oregonians make ends meet when they retire."

The Board is required to create a retirement savings plan that is:

  • Voluntary, portable, flexible and easy to access: Workers will be allowed to choose to participate or opt out. The plan will stay with workers from job to job, with funds deposited into an individual retirement account and not tied to a single employer. Employees will be able to contribute to the plan through payroll deduction.
  • Pooled and professionally managed: A well-managed plan will improve the health of investments, reduce fees and protect the interests of Oregon families.
  • Secure and protected investments: By establishing a fund to be held in the public trust, the money Oregonians invest will be shielded from being used to fund other services.
  • Available for Oregonians to begin participating in by July 1, 2017.

"Like many hardworking Oregonians, I don't have a retirement plan or the money to pay a financial advisor,” said Crystal Yeisley, a home care provider in Salem. “I'm not looking for anything fancy -- I just need a straightforward way to save the money I earn. A state-sponsored retirement plan would go a long way to helping me feel secure in planning the future."

A state-sponsored plan will make it easy for small business owners to offer retirement plans to their employees – they will only need to add a line item to the monthly pay stub.

“Far from being a burden on small businesses, the Retirement Security Bill provides an attractive option to small business owners who would like to offer their employees a retirement plan, but cannot because of cost and administrative hassle,”said State Treasurer Ted Wheeler.

Researchers from the Northwest Economic Research Center at the University of Portlandestimate that over 400,000 Oregon workers could participate in a new state-sponsored retirement plan. If those new plan enrollees earn returns that are comparable to those received by current retirees, their combined income from these plans would exceed $2 billion dollars per year.

“Many Oregonians are working hard every day, but lack a simple way to save the money they earn,” said Jerry Cohen, State Director for AARP Oregon. “A state-sponsored retirement plan benefits all of us – it helps small businesses retain employees by providing a no-cost retirement plan, it saves taxpayers money by reducing demand for public assistance programs, and it strengthens the Oregon economy.”

Posted
AuthorFair Shot For All

Contact: Rose King, (503( 863-1363, rose@brinkcomm.com

Passed by the House today, SB 454 is good for Oregon families, good for business, and good for public health

(Salem, Ore.)—The Oregon House today passed Senate Bill 454-B by a vote of 33 to 24. The legislation, co-sponsored by Senator Steiner Hayward of Beaverton and Representative Vega Pederson of Portland, will extend a moderate number of protected and paid sick days to more working Oregonians. SB 454 now heads to Governor Kate Brown, who is expected to sign the bill, making Oregon the fourth state to pass statewide sick days legislation.

“I’m proud to say that access to sick days will be a reality for every Oregonian. As a sponsor of the bill, this was a top priority for me,” said Representative Vega Pederson. “This policy will improve the lives of working families in every corner of our state. More parents will be free from making the heart wrenching choice between taking care of a sick child or losing a day of pay.” 

In 2012, the Everybody Benefits Coalition set out to win paid sick time for workers throughout Oregon. The coalition has organized in communities across the state to give a voice to working Oregonians without access to this basic workplace standard. Everybody Benefits supported both the Cities of Portland and Eugene in passing their own city ordinances in 2013 and 2014. 

“This is a historic vote for the hundreds of thousands of workers across our state who don’t have access to sick time where they work,” said Andrea Paluso, Everybody Benefits Coalition Chair and Family Forward Oregon Executive Director. “We applaud the many Oregon legislators who stood up for working families today and finally removed this barrier to good health and economic security. Ensuring access to sick time sends a message loud and clear: Oregonians believe working families do better when they have the tools they need to care for themselves and their families without sacrificing income or their employment.”

SB 454 will create a statewide standard so workers in businesses with 10 or more employees can earn one hour of paid sick time for every 30 hours worked, up to 40 hours (about five days) in a year. Workers in smaller businesses with less than 10 employees will receive job protection for up to 40 hours of unpaid sick time a year. Paid or unpaid sick time can be used for the diagnosis, care or treatment of the worker or a member of their family or in instances of domestic violence. The bill also protects employees from retaliation or discrimination for the use of sick time. 

“Today is a great day for Oregon,” said Representative Holvey. “This paid sick time law is a win for working families and all those who care about public health and economic security. I applaud everyone who supported and worked for the passage of this legislation. It's an important step forward in creating a healthier, stronger workforce for low-income workers who are still struggling to get by.” 

Paid sick time has gained support all over the country over the last few years. According to the polls, 80% of Oregon voters—including 74% of Republicans and 96% of Independents—support efforts to ensure all workers have paid sick time. Among those are business owners who’ve shown strong support for the issue. 

“Healthy workers are more productive workers," said Rosalind McCallard, Main Street Alliance member and owner of Snackrilege in Portland. "Sick days save employers money by reducing turnover and makes their employees feel valued. When my employees feel valued, they work harder. This policy is a win-win for Oregon's working families and our economy." 

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

Contact: Rose King, (503) 863.1363, rose@brinkcomm.com    

HB 3025 will help remove barriers to employment for people with past convictions and arrests 

(Salem, Ore.)—The Oregon Senate today passed HB 3025 by a vote of 21 to 8. The legislation will prohibit employers from including questions about applicants’ criminal history on job applications. HB 3025 now heads to the House for a concurrent vote and then to Governor Kate Brown for her signature.   

For more than a year, the Fair Chance for All Coalition has been working hard to remove the question “Have you ever been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor?” from job applications and provide basic protections from discrimination for people with records.  

“As Oregonians, we believe that anyone who makes a mistake and learns from it deserves a second chance,” said Tom Chamberlain, President of Oregon AFL-CIO and member of Fair Chance For All. “This bill helps make it possible for thousands of people who have paid their debts to society to one day get a job and pull their lives and their families back together.”

More than 32,000 people in Oregon are currently incarcerated or on community supervision and face barriers to housing and jobs. Nearly 11 percent of incarcerated Oregonians are African American, despite the fact that African Americans make up only 2 percent of Oregon’s overall population.

“Finding a job is one of the biggest barriers for people with past convictions, even if they are qualified for the position,” said Rep. Carla C. Piluso, former Gresham Chief of Police. “In law enforcement, we know the single most effective deterrent against re-offending is employment. Past mistakes should not be a permanent barrier for people who want to earn an honest living and contribute positively to their community. This legislation is a step in the right direction." 

In Oregon, nearly 5,000 people are released from prison every year. Banning the box will give prospective employees an opportunity to meet with employers and explain who they are now, versus who they were when they committed the crime. 

“Even today, it’s disheartening to know that no matter how qualified I am for a job, I still face barriers because of a mistake I made more than ten years ago," said Emmanuel Price, an Oregonian with personal experience transitioning from incarceration to the community.

After struggling to find employment, Price founded Second Chances Are for Every One, an organization that works to reduce the rate of recidivism by providing support services to promote employment, empowerment, and community engagement for men in transition. 

"All formerly incarcerated Oregonians deserve a fair chance at employment. And with today’s passage of Ban the Box, we will get one," said Price. 

‘The box’ has already been removed from applications for City of Portland jobs in 2014 and Multnomah County jobs in 2006 and from the City of Eugene in 2007. Once signed into law, the bill will make Oregon the 18th state in the nation to “ban the box” including: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia.

 

Posted
AuthorGuest User

Contact: Rose King, rose@brinkcomm.com, 503-863-1363

SB 454 is good for good for Oregon families, good for business, and good for public health

(Salem, Ore.)—The Oregon Senate today passed Senate Bill 454-B, sending the paid sick time bill to the Oregon House of Representatives for approval. The legislation, co-sponsored by Senator Steiner Hayward of Beaverton and Representative Vega Pederson of Portland, will ensure working Oregonians can earn a moderate number of sick days each year. The bill passed the Senate with a vote of 17-13. 

“I am thrilled that the Senate showed strong support today for paid sick days, giving more Oregon families some much-needed economic security,” said Senator Steiner Hayward following the vote. “Today’s vote was an important step forward and I’m going to keep fighting to get this done.” 

Currently, 47 percent of private-sector workers in Oregon lack paid sick time where they work. Access to paid sick time varies widely by income, with low-wage workers less likely to have access than higher-paid workers. In Oregon, 82 percent of those earning more than $65,000 annually have access to paid sick time, compared to just 29 percent of Oregonians earning less than $20,000 annually. There’s an even larger gap in access among Hispanic workers in Oregon, with 62 percent lacking paid sick time. 

“Our senate did the right thing today by passing paid sick days. Without this bill, too many Oregonians have to sacrifice a day’s pay, or their job altogether, to take care of themselves or their sick child, and that’s not how we should do business in Oregon,” said Andrea Paluso, Everybody Benefits Coalition Chair and Family Forward Oregon Executive Director. "A handful of paid sick days a year will help keep our workers, our families, our workplaces, and our communities healthier. I urge House members to support this bill and help create an economy that works for all families, not just the wealthiest few.”

Individuals without paid sick time currently have only two options: 

• Go to work sick or send a sick child to school or daycare; or 

• Stay home, lose pay and risk being fired.

“I work hard but still can’t get ahead,” said Anastasia Hernandez Vasquez, a mom from Hillsboro who lacks paid sick time. “When my special needs son gets sick and I have to stay home, I do not get paid. My husband doesn't have paid sick days either. So, staying home to recover from an illness even for a day means we lose a substantial part of our income and have to decide what part of the budget has to be cut that month: utilities, groceries, gas or things our growing children need, like a new pair of pants.”

Paid sick time has gained support all over the country in the last few years as three states and 18 cities have now passed laws and approved measures granting workers access to protected and paid sick days. The Cities of Portland and Eugene are among those that have led the movement by passing their own city ordinances.  

“This bill will not only help families, it's also good for business. Study after study finds that paid sick days boost productivity and help companies retain workers,” said Senator Dembrow. “In this case, doing the right thing for workers and their families is also the right thing for Oregon businesses.”   

SB 454 will create a statewide standard so workers all across Oregon can accrue one hour of sick time for every 30 hours worked, up to 40 hours (about five days) in a year. Sick time can be used for the diagnosis, care or treatment of the worker or a member of their family or in instances of domestic violence. The bill also protects employees from retaliation or discrimination for the use of sick time. 

The bill now awaits further consideration in the House. 

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

Three of the five 2015 Fair Shot for All priorities—paid sick days, ban the box and retirement security— headed for floor votes 

Contact: Rose King, rose@brinkcomm.com, 503.863.1363

(Salem, Ore.)—The Oregon Legislature took action this week on three policies that create economic opportunity for Oregon’s working families: expanding access to paid sick days, “banning the box” to create opportunities for people with prior convictions and arrests to find work, and making saving for retirement easier. The three bills (HB 3025, SB 454 and HB 296) represent three of the five issues that Fair Shot For All, a coalition of community and labor groups, has prioritized for the Oregon 2015 Legislative Session. 

"Fair Shot For All has been working hard all session to create real opportunities for every Oregonian to succeed,” said Heather Conroy, Executive Director for coalition member SEIU Local 503. “This week marks an important step forward as three solutions that help address economic inequality head for important votes. We urge legislators to continue to make working families a priority by supporting these bills."

The bills’ forward progress comes on the heels of a press conference held last month by Fair Shot For All, calling for lawmakers to move on key policy changes that will give hardworking Oregonians a fair shot. Workers, business owners and 10 state legislators joined the coalition in this public show of support. 

House Bill 3025, the “ban the box” legislation, passed out of the Senate Workforce Committee on Wednesday by a vote of 3 to 2. The legislation will prohibit employers from including questions about applicants’ criminal history on job applications.

Successful employment is one of the most important factors for decreasing recidivism. A steady job provides not just financial resources, but also connections to a new community that can help reduce the risk of another offense.

“People with prior convictions and arrests are regularly shut out of jobs because of one checked box on their job applications,” said Senator Michael Dembrow. “Removing questions about criminal history from job applications creates opportunities for qualified Oregonians to obtain the work they need to rebuild their lives and support their families.”  

The Oregon House passed the “ban the box” legislation in April by a vote of 33 to 27. The bill now awaits further consideration in the Senate. 

Senate Bill 454, the paid sick time bill, passed out of the Joint Ways and Means Committee today by a vote of 14 to 9. The bill, co-sponsored by Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward and Representative Jessica Vega Pederson, will create a statewide standard so workers all across Oregon can accrue one hour of sick time for every 30 hours worked, up to 40 hours in a year. 

Low-wage workers are less likely to have access to paid sick days than higher-paid workers. In Oregon, only 29 percent of Oregonians earning less than $20,000 annually have access to paid sick time, compared to 82 percent of those earning more than $65,000 annually.

"The truth is, people are more productive when they can stay home to recover and care for their families without losing pay or risking their jobs,” said Representative Jessica Vega Pederson. “Voters overwhelmingly support paid sick time and a growing number of employers do too. I urge the Senate to pass this basic workplace standard."

The paid sick time legislation now awaits further consideration in the Senate. 

House Bill 2960, the retirement security bill, passed out of the Joint Ways and Means Committee today by a vote of 14 to 9. The bill, co-sponsored by Senator Lee Beyer and Representative Tobias Read, will provide every Oregonian with a safe, easy and effective way to save for retirement.  

Currently, nearly half of all Oregonians do not have a retirement plan at work. As a result, many are at risk of living in poverty when they retire – unable to cover basic living and medical expenses.  

"It’s time to put Oregonians back in charge of their financial future,” said Representative Tobias Read. “By giving every working Oregonian an easy way to save for retirement, we can provide security for individuals, families and our communities. I'm calling on my colleagues in the House to support this legislation."   

The retirement security bill now awaits further consideration in the House. 

Posted
AuthorGuest User

Workers, business owners, state legislators, community and labor groups hold press conference calling for action on statewide paid sick days legislation

(SALEM, OR) – At a press conference in the Oregon State Capitol, the Fair Shot For All Coalition today pointed to the state legislature’s lack of progress on paid sick days, retirement security and other issues impacting income inequality. Joined by workers, business owners and several state legislators, the coalition called on lawmakers to take immediate action on a strong paid sick days law.

“Memorial Day typically marks the beginning of the end of the legislative session – and our lawmakers haven’t yet acted on key policy changes that will give hardworking Oregonians a fair shot, such as sick days and retirement security,” said Andrea Paluso, Executive Director of Family Forward Oregon and Chair of the Fair Shot for All Coalition.  “We are standing here today with working Oregonians and business owners to send a message loud and clear: it’s time to pass critical policies for working Oregonians.”

Enacting a statewide paid sick days law is one of the coalition’s top priorities. Forty-seven percent of private-sector workers in Oregon currently lack paid sick time, forcing them to chose between working sick, sending a sick child to school or losing a day’s pay when they or a family member fall ill.

“Ensuring every working Oregonian can afford to stay home when they are sick will help keep our workplaces healthy and businesses strong,” said Senator Sara Gelser. “I’ve heard loud and clear how important this issue is to Oregonians. I promised the people who elected me that I would fight for it, and I’m here to keep that promise." 

Senator Sara Gelser was joined at the press conference by colleagues Senator Michael Dembrow, Senator Chip Shields, Senator Elizabeth Steiner Hayward, Representative Peter Buckley, Representative Shemia Fagan, Representative Joe Gallegos, Representative Paul Holvey, Representative Barbara Smith Warner and Representative Jessica Vega Pederson.

Paid sick time has gained widespread support over the last few years as three states and 16 cities have now passed laws and approved measures allowing workers to accrue and access paid sick days. The City of Portland and the City of Eugene are among those approving their own city ordinances. 

“I’ve worked at a grocery store in Salem for 19 years, but when I’m sick I still have to make a choice between staying home to get better or coming in to work,” said Melody Gramley, who works at a grocery store in Salem, Oregon.  “It doesn’t matter if I’m coughing, sneezing, or have a fever – if I’m not at work, I’m not getting paid. It shouldn’t be a luxury to have a day to recover from the flu or to take care of your kids when they’re home sick. We need our legislators to take action to help working Oregonians – and we need them to do it now.”

Low-wage workers are less likely to have access to paid sick days than higher-paid workers. In Oregon, 82 percent of those earning more than $65,000 annually have access to paid sick time, compared to 29 percent of Oregonians earning less than $20,000 annually.

“My employees live in the same community I do – they work hard and they deserve time to take care of their families and to recover when they’re sick,” said Peter Emerson, owner of Bipartisan Café in Portland, Oregon. “Rather than detracting from my bottom line, paid sick time helps me retain talented employees and fosters more productivity.”

More than 300 people turned out to a February hearing on the paid sick days bills (SB 454 and HB 2005) with a strong showing among supporters of the bills—including workers, business owners, public health experts, community members, organizations, schoolteachers and more.

More than 10,000 Oregonians have signed a petition in support of paid sick days.

“Let me be clear: until there is strong paid sick days bill on the governor’s desk, we’ll be working around the clock to make sure that Oregon workers have the dignity and respect they deserve,” said Paluso.

 

 

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

Contact: Rose King, (503) 863.1363, rose@brinkcomm.com    

Fair Chance For All Coalition applauds passage of HB 3025—a critical step in giving qualified job applicants who’ve paid their debts to society a fair chance at rebuilding their lives

(Salem, Ore.)—April 29, 2015—The Oregon House of Representatives today passed HB 3025, sending the bill to the Oregon Senate for approval. The legislation will prohibit employers from including questions about applicants’ criminal history on job applications. It is backed by The Fair Chance for All coalition, a group of more than 50 organizations in Oregon.

More than 32,000 people in Oregon are currently incarcerated or on community supervision and face barriers to housing and jobs. Nearly 11 percent of incarcerated Oregonians are African American, despite the fact that African Americans make up only 2 percent of Oregon’s overall population.

Today, we are one step closer to banning the box so that thousands of people released from prison every year can obtain the jobs they need to support themselves and their families,” said Midge Purcell, Director of Advocacy and Public Policy for Portland Urban League. “These Oregonians need a second chance at rebuilding their lives.”  

Successful employment is one of the most important factors for decreasing recidivism. A steady job provides not just financial resources, but also connections to a new community that can help reduce the risk of another offense.

"As a local business owner, I believe in second chances. Punishing people for a lifetime isn’t working," said Barb Campbell, Bend City Councilor and owner of Wabi Sabi. "At the end of the day, I am looking for the most hardworking, qualified person for the job. A checked box doesn't tell me everything I need to know about an applicant."

Theresa Sweeney, an Oregonian with personal experience transitioning from incarceration to the community, continues to struggles with employment, despite earning a master’s degree in 2010.

"People say, 'Pick yourself up by your bootstraps,’ and you do, but then there are still all these barriers,” said Sweeney. “It's so frustrating. It's been eleven years and I still face repercussions. It's really hard."

‘The box’ has already been removed from applications for City of Portland jobs in 2014 and Multnomah County jobs in 2007. If the legislature passes HB 3025, Oregon will join 100 jurisdictions and 16 states that have already banned the box, including: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New Mexico, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Virginia.

The Portland City Council is also considering a ‘ban the box’ ordinance, which would apply to all employers in Portland.  A hearing was held on the resolution last month. 

Posted
AuthorGuest User

TO: Interested Parties

FROM: Heather Stuart

DATE: April 22, 2015

RE: Fair Shot For All – Progress

Over the past month, we’ve made huge strides toward adopting fair shot solutions that will create economic opportunity for Oregon’s working families. Each of the Fair Shot priorities continues to move forward in Salem and gain support among legislative leaders. Below, you’ll find details about where each bill stands and what happens next.

Statewide Rallies

On March 18, Oregonians came together in 7 cities across the state to rally in support of solutions that will create real opportunity and a real fair shot for every Oregonian.

Turnout was great and energy was high – it is clear that Oregonians are excited about the Fair Shot campaign and ready for elected leaders to stand with them on the issues they care about. We produced a 50-second video that captures the growing momentum – check it out here:

Legislative Hearings

At legislative hearings in Salem, Oregonians have gathered by the hundreds to get the attention of lawmakers and make their voices heard. They are sharing their stories of what it’s like to live and work in an economic system where the decks are stacked.

The good news is that lawmakers are listening and responding by moving Fair Shot solutions forward.

Keep reading for updates on each of the Fair Shot legislative priorities and more information about how you can get involved.

Minimum Wage

On April 13th, the Senate Committee on Workforce and the House Committee on Business and Labor held a joint public hearing on several legislative proposals that would raise the minimum wage in Oregon. Senate Bill 610, co-sponsored by Senator Shields of Portland and Representative Gorsek of Troutdale, and House Bill 2009, sponsored by Representative Nosse of Portland, were among those considered. Both bills would raise the wage to $15 per hour by 2018.

More than 250 people turned out to the hearing with a strong showing among supporters of SB 610 and HB 2009—including workers, business owners, economic analysts, community members, organizations, and more. KEZI in Eugene spoke with workers and members of the community about why increasing the minimum wage would provide a boost for families and the local economy.

Earlier in April, the Oregon Center for Public Policy released a new study showing that raising Oregon’s minimum wage to $15 per hour could boost the bottom line of small businesses, a sector that has enjoyed growth even after substantial wage hikes over the years.

Researchers found that an estimated 589,000 workers would see their wages rise if lawmakers raised the minimum wage to $15 by 2018. Over the three years that the increase would be phased in, lower-income workers as a group would gain about $3.2 billion in added wages.

Paid Sick Days

In late March, the Senate Committee on Workforce approved legislation to extend paid sick leave to working Oregonians. The bill now moves to the Joint Ways and Means Committee before receiving a full vote from the Legislature.

The bill’s progress has been covered by The Salem Statesman Journal, The Portland Business Journal, The Portland Tribune, and The Oregonian.

In February, the legislature held three hearings on the two paid sick days bills (SB 454 and HB 2005) and more than 300 people turned out to show their support and make their voices heard!

You can assist in the effort by reaching out to your senator and expressing your support for SB 454. Find out who your senator is and how to contact them here: https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/FindYourLegislator/leg-districts.html

Retirement Security

In March, researchers from the Northwest Economic Research Center (NERC) at Portland State University released a new report that details the growing retirement savings crisis in Oregon and projects the economic impact of a state-sponsored retirement savings plan.

Researchers estimate that over 400,000 Oregon workers could participate in a new state-sponsored retirement plan. If those new plan enrollees earn returns that are comparable to those received by current retirees, their combined income from these plans would exceed $2 billion dollars per year.

Researchers also found that 63-68% of employees at firms with 500 employees or more are participating in retirement plans while only 11% of employees at firms with 11 or fewer employees participate in a plan.

A state-sponsored plan would make it easy for small business owners to offer retirement plans to their employees – they would only need to add a line item to the monthly pay stub.

The next step for retirement security legislation will be approval by the Joint Committee on Ways and Means and then a vote by the full legislature.

Ban the Box

In March, the Portland City Council and the Oregon House Committee on Business and Labor both held hearings on legislation to “Ban the Box” and give qualified job applicants who’ve paid their debts to society a fair chance at rebuilding their lives.

The legislation would make it illegal for all employers to use job application forms to ask about criminal history or disqualify an applicant from employment because of a prior conviction, unless the conviction is job-related.

Employment is one of the most important influences for decreasing recidivism. Two years after release, twice as many employed people with records had avoided running into trouble with the law, compared to their unemployed counterparts. A steady job provides not just financial resource, but also connections to a new community that can help reduce the risk of recidivism.

Long after people convicted of crime have served their time, they can continue to encounter barriers to employment.  KOIN spoke with Theresa Sweeney, a mother of three children with a master’s degree who has struggled to find a job since serving time for four felony convictions in the early 2000s.

Ban the Box legislation continues to move forward in Portland and in the Oregon legislature.

 End Profiling

Eighty-five percent of Oregonians believe that law enforcement should not be allowed to profile. Yet every day, people are targeted based on their race, ethnicity, religion, national origin, language, housing status, sexual orientation or gender identity—in the streets, in our schools and in our own neighborhoods.

Oregon is only one of 8 states that haven’t banned profiling. It's about time we change that— so people don’t have to live in fear and entire communities aren’t cast as suspect simply because of what we look like, where we come from or what religion we adhere to.

Last week, Sybrina Fulton, the mother of Trayvon Martin, came to Oregon to shine a light on the issue of profiling and the dangerous consequences it can have for communities of color.  She spoke about how profiling is a concern here in Oregon, saying "It's important I come to places like Portland, which is thousands of miles away from my house, but nevertheless, it's still an important issue here."

Read more about Syrbina Fulton’s visit from KPTV.

The House Committee on Judiciary took action on April 20th to combine the three End Profiling bills (HB 2001, HB 2002 and HB 2003) into a single bill and move the legislation forward with bipartisan support. The committee also approved an amendment that would create the Law Enforcement Profiling Work Group, a new group tasked with evaluating how best to implement the new policies across the state.  The amendment requires data collection and sets up a system for people to report complaints and for those complaints to be reported back to local jurisdictions.

End Profiling legislation has also received the endorsement of the Oregon Association Chiefs of Police (OACP). The over 200 members of OACP include not only Chiefs of Police, but also police commanders, supervisors, and support staff from all over Oregon.

“Bias policing is not professional policing and the members of the Oregon Association Chiefs of Police are committed to best practice standards in hiring, policies and training designed to insure that our police officers continue to have the full confidence of the communities they serve,” said Kevin Campbell, OACP Executive Director. “Public confidence in the legitimacy of policing and in the work our police officers perform each and every day is absolutely critical to our effectiveness.”

The End Profiling legislation next moves to the Sub Joint Ways and Means Committee on Public Safety for approval before going to the full Ways and Means Committee and then a vote from the full legislature.

What’s Next?

For the Oregonian who has worked for more than twenty-five years to earn a single paid sick day, the worker who has been making minimum wage without a raise in over a decade, for the aging Oregonian who plans to work until she dies, and for the farmworker who is repeatedly cut out of our most important labor laws—change cannot come fast enough.

Folks across Oregon are ready for Fair Shot solutions and they’re putting the pressure on lawmakers to get it done.

To find out how you can participate, visit the Fair Shot for All website. Follow Fair Shot for All on Facebook for the latest updates on progress in Salem and across the country.

Onward!

 - Heather

 

Heather Stuart

Fair Shot for All Campaign Director

 

Posted
AuthorChristine Saunders

Legislators establish workgroup to identify and address profiling practices, consolidate bills with bipartisan support during Monday work session.

Salem, Ore. – The Oregon Association Chiefs of Police (OACP) announced their support Monday for legislation designed to put an end to profiling in Oregon by clearly defining the problem in statute, collecting better data, and providing a path for reporting profiling complaints. The over 200 members of OACP include not only Chiefs of Police, but also police commanders, supervisors, and support staff from all over Oregon.

“First of all, I would like to thank the legislative sponsors and proponents of HB 2002 for engaging us in an important conversation regarding bias policing and the provisions of this measure,” said Kevin Campbell, Executive Director of the Oregon Association Chiefs of Police. “We worked collaboratively with the Center for Intercultural Organizing and other proponents to insure that Oregonians from all perspectives and backgrounds have a place to take their bias policing complaints if they don’t feel comfortable complaining directly to their local police agency. Bias policing is not professional policing and the members of the Oregon Association Chiefs of Police are committed to best practice standards in hiring, policies and training designed to insure that our police officers continue to have the full confidence of the communities they serve. Public confidence in the legitimacy of policing and in the work our police officers perform each and every day is absolutely critical to our effectiveness.”

The House Committee on Judiciary took action on April 20th to combine the three End Profiling bills (HB 2001, HB 2002 and HB 2003) into a single bill and move the legislation forward with bipartisan support. The committee also approved an amendment that would create the Law Enforcement Profiling Work Group, a new group tasked with evaluating how best to implement the new policies across the state.  The amendment requires data collection and sets up a system for people to report complaints and for those complaints to be reported back to local jurisdictions.

“Oregon’s law enforcement leaders recognize that to improve public safety and end discriminatory profiling practices, they must work hand-in-hand with the communities they serve,” said Kayse Jama, Executive Director of the Center for Intercultural Organizing. “This endorsement shows that our law enforcement leaders are ready to step up, identify problems of profiling, and take action to make our communities safer.

Progress will require a cultural and systemic shift away from policing tactics that utilize profiling to community policing, a more effective public safety strategy that fosters trust between law enforcement officers and communities by building partnerships and addressing the conditions that generate public safety issues.

"The scariest thing to me is that so many people don't believe that racial profiling exists in Oregon," said Ricardo Lujan, Board Member for Oregon Action. "Profiling of all kinds damages the relationship between the law enforcement and our communities. By collecting data and providing accountability, this bill will make our neighborhoods and families safer."

The work group will be tasked with proposing a process to identify patterns or practices of profiling, identifying methods to address and correct these practices and biased policies, and preparing a report identifying any additional statutory changes that are needed to achieve these goals.

The End Profiling legislation next moves to the Sub Joint Ways and Means Committee on Public Safety for approval before going to the full Ways and Means Committee and then a vote from the full legislature.

If you have questions about details of the legislation, please contact Salome Chimuku with the Center for Intercultural Organizing at (503) 754-0413 or Mary Beth Williams with the office of Rep. Peter Buckley at (207) 318-3224.  If you would like to interview Kevin Campbell of the Oregon Association Chiefs of Police or Ricardo Lujan of Oregon Action, please contact Mike Westling at mike@brinkcomm.com or (503) 498-8161 to coordinate.

Posted
AuthorFair Shot For All

Contact: Rose King, (503) 863-1363, rose@brinkcomm.com

SB 610 and HB 2009 strengthen working families, boost buying power of millions of Oregonians, power local economy and help small businesses grow

(Salem, Ore.)—The Senate Committee on Workforce and the House Committee on Business and Labor tonight held a joint public hearing on several legislative proposals that would raise the minimum wage in Oregon. Senate Bill 610, co-sponsored by Senator Shields of Portland and Representative Gorsek of Troutdale, and House Bill 2009, sponsored by Representative Nosse of Portland, were among those considered. Both bills would raise the wage to $15 per hour by 2018.

“By giving our workers a raise, we will ensure all Oregonians get a fair shot at a better life while boosting the buying power of consumers across the state," said Representative Nosse, sponsor of the bill. "It's a win-win for working families and our local economy.”

More than 200 people turned out to the hearing with a strong showing among supporters of SB 610 and HB 2009—including workers, business owners, economic analysts, community members, organizations, and more.

A broad coalition submitted testimony in support of the bills, including: Tom Chamberlain, President of the Oregon AFL-CIO; Rob Sisk, President of SEIU Local 503; Kasil Kapriel, a single-working mom from Portland; Stephen Michael, Oregon State Director for the Main Street Alliance; and Daniel Morris, Research Director for Our Oregon.

“Raising Oregon’s minimum wage to $15 will really help our families who are struggling to get ahead," said Andrea Paluso, Executive Director of Family Forward Oregon and Co-Chair of the Fair Shot For All Coalition. "For the working mom who's been paid minimum wage for over a decade without a raise, change cannot come fast enough. It’s time for elected officials to make us a priority and give Oregonians a much-needed raise."

The High Cost of Low Wages in Oregon, a report from the University of Oregon’s Labor Education and Research Center (LERC) released earlier this year, found that 197,000 Oregonians who received public assistance in January 2014 worked the previous year. And the cost of providing this assistance falls on taxpayers who provide $1.7 billion each year to subsidize corporations’ reliance on a low-wage workforce.

Currently, one in four Oregon workers brings home less than $25,000 each year. Women and people of color make up the largest percentage of our low-wage workforce. In Oregon, women represent more than half of minimum wage workers while people of color make up about 36 percent.

“It is difficult to balance the needs of my three kids with a full-time job where I make only $9.25 an hour,” said Kasil Kapriel, a single-working mom from Portland. "If we raised the minimum wage to $15, I would be able to pay my rent on time and save for my children’s education.”

Small business owners have joined working Oregonians from across the state in calling on the legislature to pass a higher minimum wage. 

"Better wages make for more satisfied, more motivated, and overall more productive employees," said Mark Kellenbeck, Co-owner of BrainJoy in Medford, and Co-Chair of The Main Street Alliance of Oregon. "We have consistently found that better wages both attract and retain superior employees."

According to a study released last week by the Oregon Center for Public Policy, raising Oregon’s minimum wage to $15 per hour could boost the bottom line of small businesses, a sector that has enjoyed growth even after substantial wage hikes over the years.

Both bills now await work sessions in their respective committees.

 

 

Posted
AuthorFair Shot For All